| |
<--- Roman Governor Agricola, statue emplaced on a terrace in 1896 overlooking the Great Bath at the spa in Bath England. Labeled "Agricola" but there's no contemporary clue of how he really looked . |
|
Flavian Dynasty ---> |
| Every Governor would envy one that might have a panegyrist on his staff, and it might get even better if that writer was a son-in-law. Agricola's daughter was married to the Roman historian and politician Publius Cornelius Tacitus, who, today, is recognized as one of the most accurate, least biased historians of his time. |
| A full
English translation of "The Agricola" is on the Internet
at https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Agricola.
|
| |
<--- Publius Cornelius Tacitus. What we know about Agricola, aside from a few inscription for corroboration, comes from the Tacitus eulogy/ biography/travelogue/anthopology study of the Briton Celts. |
<--- Put a framed "Fine Arts" print of this John Harris Valda imagination of the Romans storming ashore on Mona Island for only $64 at https://fineartamerica.com/featured/the-roman-attack-on-anglesey-john-harris-valda.html. |
| Tacitus
wrote in his later book, the Annals, 14.37,
talks of the methods of Suetonius Paulinus (who Tacitus
clearly despised: "the [Roman] troops gave no quarter even to the women: the baggage animals themselves had been speared and added to the pile of bodies. The glory won in the course of the day was remarkable and equal to that of our older victories: for, by some accounts, little less than 80,000 Britons fell at a cost of some 400 Romans killed. |
| After
quelling the Iceni revolt, Paulinus was relieved for
using excessive force. |
| At some point during the times of the Welsh/Anglesey operations and the suppression of the Iceni revolt, Agricola interacted with Vespasion, whose own mission, successfully accomplished, had been to bring southwest Britain under Roman control. |
| In 70 AD Agricola
was called up again to fight in Britain. His first
job was to suppress a mutiny of the XX
Legion. After bringing the legion back into line
and given command of the XXth, Argicola, Then he
joined (according to Tacitus) the then Roman occupation
Governor of Britania, Petilius Cerialis, in bloody
battles against the largest and then most powerful
Celtic Briton tribal alliance, called for
convenience the Brigantes, who controlled central Britain. Cerialis split the Roman occupation armies into two columns and gave command of the western column to Agricola. Both columns then worked their way north pushing the Brigantes ahead of them. On reaching Carlisle, Agricola crossed back eastward through Stainmore Pass and with Cerialis brought the Brigantes to battle and neutralized them. The battle is thought to have occurred at a stronghold called Stanwick Camp, an Iron Age hillfort. Agricola was again demobilized having participated in two successful campaigns in Britain (both of which memorialized by Tacitus). |
| Agricola was the called up
once more by Vespasian in 77/78 AD to be the Governor of
the Province (Legatus Augusti pro praetore --
Britain was an imperial rather than a senatoria province
and home of four Legions). During his tenure, until 83/84 AD, he significantly expanded Roman control through his military campaigns in Wales, northern England, and souhern Scotland, culminating in the victory over the Caledonian tribes at the Battle of Mons Graupius. He also focused on consolidating Roman rule by promoting infrastructure, Roman style towns, and education to Romanize the local population, an important policy that was documented by Tacitus. |
| Agricola also expanded
Roman rule north into Caledonia (modern Scotland). In the summer of 79, he pushed his armies to the estuary of the river Taus, usually interpreted as the Firth of Tay, virtually unchallenged, and established some forts. Though their location is left unspecified, the close dating of the fort at Elginhaugh in Midlothian makes it a possible candidate. |
Excavated part of the Elginhaugh fort |
In 81, Agricola "crossed in the
first ship" and defeated peoples unknown to the Romans until
then. Tacitus, in Chapter 24 of Agricola,
does not tell us what body of water he crossed. Modern
scholarship favors either the Firth of Clyde or Firth of Forth.
Tacitus also mentions Hibernia, so
southwest Scotland is perhaps to be preferred.
The text of the Agricola has been
amended here to record the Romans "crossing into trackless
wastes", referring to the wilds of the Galloway peninsula. Agricola
fortified the coast facing Ireland, and Tacitus recalls that his
father-in-law often claimed the island could be conquered with a
single legion and auxiliaries. He
had given refuge to an exiled Irish king whom he hoped he might
use as the excuse for conquest. This conquest never happened,
but some historians believe the crossing referred to was in fact
a small-scale exploratory or punitive
expedition to
Ireland, though no Roman
camps have been identified to confirm such a suggestion.
The invasion of Caledonia (Scotland)
The following year, Agricola raised a
fleet, named as the Classis Britanica, and encircled the tribes
beyond the Forth, and the Caledonians rose in
great numbers against him. They attacked the camp of the Legio
IX Hispana at night, but
Agricola sent in his cavalry and they were put to
flight. The Romans responded by pushing further north.
| In the summer of 83, Agricola faced the massed
armies of the Caledonians, led by Calgacus,
at the Battle
of Mons Graupius. Tacitus
estimates their numbers at more than 30,000. Agricola put his auxiliaries in the front line, keeping the legions in reserve, and relied on close-quarters fighting to make the Caledonians' long unpointed slashing swords useless as they were unable to swing them properly or utilise thrusting attacks. Even though the Caledonians were put to route and therefore lost this battle, two thirds of their army managed to escape and hide in the Highlands or the "trackless wilds" as Tacitus calls them. Battle casualties were estimated by Tacitus to be about 10,000 on the Caledonian side and 360 on the Roman side. A number of authors have reckoned the battle to have occurred in the Grampian Mounth within sight of the North Sea. In particular, Roy, Surenne, Watt, Hogan and others have advanced notions that the site of the battle may have been Kempstone Hill, Megray Hill or other knolls near the Raedykes Roman camp; these points of high ground are proximate to the Elsick Mounth, an ancient trackway used by Romans and Caledonians for military manoeuvres. However, following the discovery of the Roman camp at Durno in 1975, most scholars now believe that the battle took place on the ground around Bennachie in Aberdeenshire. After winnning at Mons Gropius: |
Agricola (2nd right) next to young Tacitus Among Roman Generals and Emperors in a frieze from the Great Hall of the National Galleries, Scotland, by William Brassey Hole, 1897. The frieze, of which this is a segment, continues along the upper edge of all four sides of the Great Hall.
|
| Agricola also instructed the prefect of the (Classis Britanica) fleet to sail around the north coast, confirming (allegedly for the first time) that Britain was in fact an island. This voyage, described by Tacitus, was a significant result for the Roman conquest and also a great accomplishment of the Classis Britannica (the name of the fleet). |
| Archeology: In 2019, GUARD Archaeology (commercial archeology management) team led by Iraia Arabaolaza uncovered a marching camp dating to the 1st century AD in Ayr, used by Roman legions during the invasion of Roman General Agricola. According to Arabaolaza, the fire pits were split 30 meters apart into two parallel lines. The findings also included clay-domed ovens and 26 fire pits dated to between 77- 86 AD and 90 AD loaded with burnt material and charcoal contents. Archaeologists suggested that this site had been chosen as a strategic location for the Roman conquest of Ayrshire. |
Agricola was recalled from Britain
in 85, after an unusually long tenure as governor of the
province. Tacitus claims that Domitian ordered his
recall because Agricola's successes outshone the emperor's own
modest victories in Germany. Agricola re-entered Rome
unobtrusively, reporting, as ordered, to the imperial palace at
night.
The relationship between Agricola and the emperor is unclear; on the one hand, Agricola was awarded triumphal decorations and a statue (the highest military honours apart from an actual triumph); on the other, Agricola never again held a civil or military post, in spite of his experience and renown. He was offered the governorship of the province of Africa, but declined it, whether due to ill health or (as Tacitus claims) the machinations of Domitian.
In 93, Agricola died on his family
estates in Gallia Narbonensis (Provence) only at aged
fifty-three. According to his son-in-law, Tacitus, rumours
circulated attributing the death to a poison administered by
emperor Domitian, but no positive evidence for this was ever
produced.
--------------------------------------------------------
Londinium - London
Londinium, 150 AD, as developed by the Roman occupation, by this time the provincial capital. An earlier version had been once completely destroyed with massive casualties in the 60 AD Iceni ("Boudiccan") revolt. The Romans appear to have chosen this place to establish a port, because a bridge across the Thames could be built here at a shallow spot where there was a pre-existing ford, and because it was a place that was tidal and could accommodate Roman shipping. |
Unlike many Roman
settlements established on already existing Briton
Celtic Oppida (La Tene type settlements), there does not
appear to have been any previous Iron Age town here
before the Claudian conquest of 43 AD. There are remnants of several Iron Age hillforts and enclosures within greater London today (eg, at Wimbledon and Epping Forest) of the Trinovantes or Catuellauni. |
The Cripplegate Bastion, technically the rounded section at the right side of the image, added during the Medieval period. After the 5th century Roman withdrawal from Britain, the walls began to collapse due to lack of repairs. They were restored in the late Anglo-Saxon period, a process generally thought to have begun under Alfred the Great after 886. Repairs and enhancements continued throughout the medieval period. The wall largely defined the boundaries of the City of London until the later Middle Ages, when population rises and the development of towns around the city blurred the perimeter. |
Roman London was,
from around 120 until 150, protected by a large
fort, with a large garrison, that stood to its
north-western side. The fort, now referred to as the
Cripplegate Fort, was later
incorporated into a complete city-wide defence, with
its strengthened northern and western sides becoming
part of the Wall which was built around 200. The
incorporation of the fort's walls gave the walled
area its distinctive shape in the north-west part of
the city.
|
London Bridge (round black dot, center), was the only bridged crossing of the River Thames near London at the time. The next bridge upstream is at Pontes/Staines. |
From https://mappinglondon.co.uk/2013/londons-roman-roads/ The black triangles and circles show known Roman villas and other settlements, while the lines show the main Roman roads at the presumed height of the Roman occupation of Britain – dotted lines show where the road route is not known exactly at the time of the map’s production. The patterns of dots/circles show wooded areas. The eight roads shown, clockwise from the north, are:
|
A general outline of Roman
London in late antiquity, with the modern banks of the
Thames.[1] Discovered
roads drawn as double lines; conjectural roads, single
lines.
|
|
|
|
|
| Location | London, United Kingdom |
|---|---|
| Coordinates | 51°30′45″N 0°05′26″W |
| Type | Roman city |
| History | |
| Founded | 43 – 50 AD[2][3] |
| Periods | Roman Empire |
Londinium, also
known as Roman
London, was the capital of Roman
Britain
during most of the period of Roman rule. Most
twenty-first century historians think that it was
first a settlement founded shortly after the Claudian
invasion of Britain, on the current site of the
City of
London, around 47–50 AD, but some
defend an older view that the city originated in a defensive
enclosure constructed during the Claudian invasion in 43 AD. Its
earliest securely dated structure is a timber drain of 47
AD.
| Archeology:
One of Londinium's many wooden drains, not the earliest 47 AD Drain but a later version, a more visible one that shows better how the drains were made. Wood is often well preserved in London's drenched environment -- gravelly soil over hard clay, the reason so many drains were needed to move rainwater down to the Thames. The Romans used wood for drains and wells, the abundance of which allows for a complete dendrochrology sequence. |
Londinium sat at a key ford at the River Thames which turned the city into a road nexus and major port (which was built between 49 and 52 AD), serving as a major commercial centre in Roman Britain until its shrinkage during the 3rd and 4th centuries and final abandonment during the 5th century.
Following the foundation of
the town in the mid-1st century, early Londinium occupied
the relatively small area of 1.4 sq km
(0.5 sq mi), roughly half the area of the modern
City of London and equivalent to the size of present-day Hyde Park.
In 60 or 61 AD, the rebellion of the Iceni under their queen, Boudica, compelled the Roman forces to abandon the settlement, which was then razed. Following the defeat of Boudica by the Roman governor Gaius Suetonius Paulinus, a military installation was established, and the city was rebuilt. It had probably largely recovered within about a decade. During the later decades of the 1st century, Londinium expanded rapidly, becoming Britannia's largest and most prosperous city, and it was provided with large public buildings such as a forum and amphitheatre. By the 2nd century, Londinium had grown to perhaps 30,000 or 60,000 people, almost certainly replacing Camulodunum (Colchester) as the provincial capital, and by the mid-2nd century Londinium was at its height. Its forum basilica was one of the largest structures north of the Alps when Emperor Hadrian visited Londinium in 122. Excavations have discovered evidence of a major fire that destroyed much of the city shortly thereafter, but the city was again rebuilt. By the second half of the 2nd century, Londinium appears to have shrunk in both size and population.
Although Londinium remained
important for the rest of the Roman period, no further
expansion resulted. Londinium supported a
smaller but stable settlement population as archaeologists
have found that much of the city after this date was covered
in dark earth
— the by-product of urban household waste, manure, ceramic
tile, and non-farm debris of settlement occupation, which
accumulated relatively undisturbed for centuries. Some
time between 190 and 225, the Romans built a defensive wall
around the landward side of the city. The London
Wall survived for another 1,600 years and
broadly defined the perimeter of the old City of London
The Roman city ultimately covered at least the area of the current City of London, whose boundaries are largely defined by its former wall. Londinium's waterfront on the Thames ran from around Ludgate Hill in the west to the present site of the Tower in the east, around 1.5 kilometres (0.93 mi). The northern wall reached Bishopsgate and Cripplegate near the former site of the Museum of London, a course now marked by the street "London Wall". Cemeteries and suburbs existed outside the city proper. A round temple has been located west of the city, although its dedication remains unclear.
Substantial suburbs existed at St Martin-in-the-Fields in Westminster and around
the southern end of the Thames bridge in Southwark, where excavations in 1988 and 2021 have
revealed an elaborate building with fine mosaics and
frescoed walls dating from 72 AD. Inscriptions
suggest a temple of Isis was located
there.
Londinium grew up as a vicus, a community of lower status
than a town or a civilian settlement adjacent
to and somewhat dependent on a fort.
Londinium soon became an important port for trade between Roman Britain and the Roman provinces on the continent. Tacitus wrote that at the time of the uprising of Boudica, "Londinium... though undistinguished by the name of 'colony', was much frequented by a number of merchants and trading vessels. |
Imaginative view of port warehouses along the Thames |
Depending on the time of its creation, the modesty of Londinium's first forum may have reflected its early elevation to city (municipium) status or may have reflected an administrative concession to a low-ranking but major Romano-British settlement. It had almost certainly been granted colony (colonia) status prior to the complete replanning of the city's street plan attending the erection of the great second forum with a basilicca around the year 120.
By this time, Britain's provincial
administration had also almost certainly been moved to Londinium
from Camulodunum (now Colchester in Essex). The
precise date of this change is unknown, and no surviving source
explicitly states that Londinium was "the capital of Britain,"
but there are several strong indications of this status:
2nd-century roofing tiles have been found marked by the "Procurator"
or "Publican of the
Province of Britain at Londinium", the remains of a governor's palace
and tombstones belonging to the governor's staff have been
discovered, and the city was well defended and armed, with a new
military camp erected at the beginning of the 2nd century in a
fort on the north-western edge of the city, despite being far
from any frontier. Despite some
corruption to the text, the list of bishops for the 314 Council of Arles indicates
that either Restitutus or Adelphius
came from Londinium. The city seems
to have been the seat of the diocesan vicar (a civil, not a
religious post) and one of the provincial governors following
the Diocletian Reforms around 300
that spit Britania into more than one province; it had been
renamed Augusta—a
common epithet of provincial capitals—by 368.
Unlike many cities of Roman Britain, Londinium was not placed on the site of a native settlement or oppidum. Prior to the arrival of the Roman legions, the area was almost certainly lightly rolling open countryside traversed by numerous streams now underground. Ptolemy lists it as one of the cities of the Cantiaci, but Durovernu (Roman Canterbury) was their tribal capital (civitas). It is possible that the town was preceded by a short-lived Roman military camp, but the evidence is limited and this topic remains a matter of debate.
|
Archaeologist Lacey Wallace notes "Because no Late preRoman Iron Age settlements or significant domestic refuse have been found in London, despite extensive archaeological excavation, arguments for a purely Roman foundation of London are now common and not controversial. The city's Latin name seems to have derived from an originally Brittonic one and significant pre-Roman finds in the Thames, especially the Battersea Shield (Chelsea Bridge, perhaps 4th-century BC) and the Wandsworth Shield (perhaps 1st-century BC), both assumed to be votive offerings deposited a couple of miles upstream of Londinium, suggest the general area was busy and significant. It has been suggested that the area was where several territories intersected. There was probably a ford in that part of the river; other Roman and Celtic finds suggest this was perhaps where the opposed crossing that Julius Caesar described in 54 BC took place. Londinium expanded around the point on the River Thames narrow enough for the construction of a Roman bridge but still deep enough to handle the era's seagoing ships. Its placement on the Tideway permitted easier access for ships sailing upstream. The remains of a massive pier base for such a bridge were found in 1981 close by the modern London Bridge.Some Claudian-era camp ditches have been discovered, but archaeological excavations undertaken since the 1970s by the Department of Urban Archaeology at the Museum of London (now MOLAS) have suggested the early settlement was largely the product of private enterprise. A timber drain by the side of the main Roman road excavated at No 1 Poultry has been dated by dendrochronology to 47 AD. |
Following its foundation in the
mid-1st century, early Roman London occupied a relatively small
area, about 350 acres (1.4 sq km) or roughly the area of
present-day Hyde Park.
Archaeologists have uncovered numerous goods imported from
across the Roman Empire in this period, suggesting that early
Roman London was a highly cosmopolitan community of merchants
from across the empire and that local markets existed for such
objects.
Decline of Londinium -- 2nd
century and later:
Roman civilization as a whole reached its zenith during the
mid-1st century, at
around the same time that London was being established.
While London matured and grew on the western extreme of the
empire through the 2nd and 3rd centuries, it
was protected from troubles
in Rome and elsewhere, and
occasionally prospered,
|
Under the Saxon Medieval Church of All Hallows by the Tower is a small museum that houses, among a wealth of Roman, Saxon, and "other" artifacts, what has aptly been described as an undistinguished Roman Londinium floor -- not mosaic or inlay or anything special, just neatly arrayed small cobbles, enough to prove that Romans were there. I'd love to see what might be under that floor. Also in the crypt is what sometimes is said to be a Roman arch. It fits the definition of the Roman architectural TYPE of arch: it is semi-circular at the top with straight sides, so it is architecturally Roman. But as for who built the arch, it looks Saxon: the rounded section appears to be made of "Roman Brick", but the laying of the bricks, their angles, are off. The mortar between the bricks could easily be dated, but the guide wasn't able to tell me if tests had ever been applied. |
| Found in 2013 at a site
once occupied by a Londinium cemetery and initially
thought to be a recent garden decoration, this Roman
eagle with captive snake made of Cotswald limestone was
soon identified as an authentic, very well carved and
preserved 1st or 2nd century Londinium artifact.
It stands a little more than two feet high. The
eagle's broken off (look closely) right wing has not
been reattached, but rather it and the eagle rest
together in a purpose-built frame in the Museum of
London. The symbolism is understood as the struggle of good, the eagle, against evil, the snake. In Roman mythology the image of an eagle represents Jupiter (a name derived from "Zeus Pater") This Eagle/snake theme is common in funerary contexts and an important Roman cemetery is known to have been located on the site. It is believed by archaeologists that this statue once stood in a niche a rich mausoleum, the foundations of one were also uncovered during excavation. The lack of weathering on the statue corroborates this theory, as does the absence of detail on the back of the sculpture; suggesting it once sat it an alcove. The piece was described by National Geographic as "the finest piece of Roman sculpture ever found in London". Link: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/eagle-serpent-limestone-sculpture-discovery-roman-london-science-archaeology |
The third century "Bucklersby Pavement" mosaic was discovered in central London in 1869. The Museum of London,where it now resides (display pictured) calls it one of the most important relics from Londinium. The upper image is a drawing that appeared in a London newspaper while the mosaic was being excavated. The discovery of the "Pavement" caused great excitement. |
Replica versions of the
Bucklersby Pave-ment are found at a few locations
including the site of the London Mithraeum and the
Purbeck House Hotel. The Pavement was originally found
near the Mithraeum site. The Hotel, in Swanage,
England, was built as a private residence by George
Burt, whose company worked on the construction of Queen
Victoria Street, London, where the original Pavement was
unearthed. -------------------------------------------------- A more recently discovered (2022) 1st or 2nd century mosaic is thought to be the floor of a triclinium, a dining room, in a mansio, a high end temporary residence for official government travelers or curiers. A triclinium could accommodate three wide reclining couches on three sides of the room. On each couch three persons would lay sideways to eat. Overeating or drinking to excess or drinking unwatered wine was considered declasse. |
| It is
sometimes said that not much of Roman Londinium has
survived. Tell that to anyone who has ever tried to build a skyscraper in central London. When you dig a foundation for any structure, you have to take out an amount of dirt that has the same weight as the structure and its expected contents and sink piles to keep it all from slipping sideways. If building-plus-contents weight us more than the extracted weight, the building will compress what is left under it and sink. If there is not enough weight to replace what was extracted, it could be even worse: what is below your structure might decompress and pop your building upward. Add heavy contents quickly. (I know this stuff because Dad's company specialized in remediating the ups and downs of building weight miscalculations.) The point that interests us, however, is that Londinium, by itself, sat where the "City of London", AKA the "Square mile", AKA the London "Financial District" sits today. "Londinium Plus", was where Roman Londinium spread outward before it began to shrink backtoward the end of the 2nd century. Experience shows that you can't start to extract soil or to break down an old structure to build a new one without attracting archeologists (nowadays, usually from the Museum of London). Londinium is down there. |