Iron Age British "Celts" -- Before the Romans
Arrived
"Celtic" Brittons were only identified as Celts by the Romans,
specifically by Julius Caesar in his Gallic Wars and only
because he could easily see that there were learned cultural and
linguistic affinities between the Brittons and the European
mainland tribes who had been called Keltoi
by the Greeks starting around 600 BC.
The Romans accepted the Keltoi appelation for the tribal peoples
of central and western Europe, but also knew that the
inhabitants of the British Islands had been considered by the
Greeks to have been called Prytanoi (= Brittons) and
that the Islands were called Albion.
There had been pre-humans (proto-Neanderthals
-- homo
antecessor) on the island during interglacial
periods at least since 600,000 BC and Homo Sapiens Sapiens
(like us) on the Islands throughout the current interglacial
(Holocene), which has been underway since about 10,000 BC.
Twentieth and 21st century anthropologists have noted that
"proto-Celtic" language and culture seems to have first risen as
the late Bronze Age and early Iron Age "Hallstatt
Culture" (ca. 1000 to ca. 700 BC), named after the
culture's original earliest findspot near the Austrian Alp lake
Hallstatt. Hundreds of well preserved Hallstatt pre-Celtic
burials were found in a cemetery in a prehistoric salt mining
area. Grave goods has "early celtic" decoration.

Hallstatt Culture Artifacts

Part of the records of the Hallstatt
cemetery archeological dig
The next known Celtic landmark culture is called the La
Tene culture, named for its findspot at the
archeological site at the eastern end of Lake Neuchatel: La Tene
= "the shallows" in French. The La Tene name has since
been extended to denominate the Late Iron age culture of
European Celts.

Spears, shields and long swords. Gods, heroes, notables
were often depicted only as their heads, where celts believed
resided the personality or personhood. Lower right is an
example of La
Tene repousse metal work characteristic of
European Celtic Art.

European Celtic tribal areas. Tribal names and areas
were only recorded by Greco-Roman sources. (The Celts had no
writing system/written language of their own and so, essentially
recorded nothing independently). Tribal names, individual
names, Celtic place names, incident names/times/places during
Roman mainland and British Island conquests of Celts, and subsequent
military occupations were variously and inconsistently reported
by Roman historians and letter writers, and, thus, are still
disputed both for academic and, also, more recently, for current
(i.e., today) political/ideological reasons.

Celtic warriors as depicted by the Romans and more recently.

Celtic
tribal areas in Britania as recorded by the Romans.
Tribal borders often changed as a result of inter-tribal
disputes, population growth or declines, and, later, favor or
disfavor of the Roman military government. Strongholds
were often marked by iron age Hill Forts.





We are still dependent on how the Romans described and depicted
the Britons.
Notice the "tartan" looking textiles, which call into
question the idea that such patterns were developed much later.


Well before the Romans came, the Brithish Celts had become
agriculturalists and most of the population of the Islands
remained farmers throughout the occupation.

Near the coasts and internal waterways fishing augmented the
Celtic food supply. During the Roman occupation, Britain
became a foodstuffs exporter.

