Syllabus [Word origin: 1650–60; A neo-Latin neologism, syllabus, syllabos is probably a misreading (in manuscripts of Cicero) of Greek síttybās, accusative plural of síttyba = a label for a papyrus roll] Ancient Rome in the Movies Ten
three hour sessions -- on line: ZOOM
Course Units (one film per unit):Click image or this line to enlarge the image Some film makers got ancient Rome right. Some got it wrong. Some didn't get it at all. Many films about Rome tell us more about the biases of the times in which they were made than about the times they claim to depict. Some are "message" films, and some just carry forward the message of the books on which they were based. There is nothing in the historical account of Spartacus, for example, that would lead us to accept the "Christian" message of the Spartacus film epic or of the Howard Fast novel on which it is based (nor, for that matter, is there any proletarian internationalism that could explain the former Soviet fascination with "Spartakiad". Recent big budget films, made for theaters, tend to get the background right, but they badly garble their historical story lines. Lower budget theater films don't even try for background accuracy much less for historical fact -- "Sword of the Arena", a girl gladiator flick, comes to mind (although there were some documented female gladiators). Televison productions vary greatly in authenticity: the History Channel, just one example, will buy and broadcast almost any show that claims to be "historical", so some History Channel content is completely bogus. Also, television time is usually sold in small chunks, so instead of getting an "in depth" 145 minute theater version of Rome, we may only get the 60 minute television version -- minus, of course, about 13 minutes for "messages from our sponsors." The recent Italian-made HBO "Rome" series falls into its own category: it's an in depth fictional soft porn soap opera and has almost no accurate historical content. (That doesn't mean it's not fun to watch, but we won't, so watch it on your own time.) "I Claudius" is fairly accurate (except that his wife probably did not poison him) but the series is just too long for this course so, again, watch it on your own time. There are, of course some good films on ancient Rome, and some of them have unusual formats. "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum", our first film, based on plays by ancient Rome's best comedic playwright, fully captures the irreverence for status and authority of the ancient Roman comedic stage. Other films will follow. Popcorn not provided. A few rambling random introductory notes for the course are available at http://www.mmdtkw.org/ARMovIntroRamble.html Textbooks: No textbook will be needed for this course. The usual handouts will be provided for each unit. But if you really think you must have a book, try one of these: Big
Screen
Rome, by Monica Silveira Cyrino or
Imperial Projections: Ancient Rome in Modern Popular Culture, by Sandra B. Joshel et al. or Projecting the Past: Ancient Rome, Cinema, and History, by Maria Wyke The
following contain links to pages that are available on
the Internet.
Please note that links on the Internet are notoriously volatile. I can not predict or prevent "broken links" due to changes in other folks' Internet sites. If you don't find what the link calls for, you can always search using Google or some othe search engine. |
|
Ancient
Rome in the Movies -- The Films: |
Note that some of the links below are from
Wikipedia, "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit". Like much other information on the Internet, what appears in Wikipedia should be taken cum grano salis. ------------------------------------------------------------------- |
1. A
Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum (1966) Click for larger image 97 Minutes |
A movie based on a broadway musical, which was
based on three plays that Plautus (ca. 200 bc) may have
copied from the Greek stage. The broad comedy of
Zero Mostel made the movie and the Broadway musical a
success, and he was alsothe force behind bringing other
previously blacklisted actors and staff into the
production. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Funny_Thing_Happened_on_the_Way_to_ the_Forum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plautus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Mostel |
2.
Scipio Africanus -- The Defeat of Hannibal (1937) Click for larger image 93 Minutes |
Made by Mussolini's son in
1937, the year of the Italian Trans-Libyan Highway and
Italy's invasion of Ethiopia, this film won the Venice
Film Festival prize for that year. It's clearly a
propaganda piece glorifying Italian imperialism,
but it is, nonetheless, surprisingly accurate. It's climax
is the Battle of Zama (in modern Tunisia) in
202 BC, which ended the Second Punic War
between Rome and Carthage. http://www.ihffilm.com/scipafdefofh.html http://www.roman-empire.net/army/zama.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini |
3.
Spartacus (1960) Click for larger image 198 Minutes |
A very
ficticious story of Rome's Third Servile War (73 - 70 BC),
this is the movie that really broke the Hollywood
blacklist. Kirk Douglas, producer as well as star of
the epic, brought in the blacklisted screen-writer Dalton
Trumbo and insisted that he be credited with the authorship
of the screenplay. Trumbo drew his story from
Howard Fast's 1951 novel and, like fast, portrayed Spartacus
as a popular revolutionary. Many scholars disagree
saying that Spartacus was just a wily escapee with no grand
revolutionary agenda. It's impossible to say who was
right: the historical evidence is extremely
sketchy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spartacus http://www.vroma.org/~bmcmanus/spartacus.html http://www.historyinfilm.com/spart/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Fast http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalton_Trumbo |
4. Julius Caesar (1953) Click for larger image 121 Minutes |
Julius Caesar is the name of the production,
but he dies early on. Shakespeare's story is really about
Marc Antony's destruction of the liberatori who had assassinated
Caesar. This film
is recognized as one of Brando's greatest performances,
and it is acclaimed by Shakespeare specialists as
well as by the Hollywood crowd. Time period covered
is 44 and 43 BC. http://www.sparknotes.com/shakespeare/juliuscaesar/ http://www-tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/julius_caesar/index.html part of http://www-tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Caesar_(1953_film) http://movies2.nytimes.com/mem/movies/review.html?_r=3&title1=Julius %20Caesar&title2=&reviewer=BOSLEY%20CROWTHER http://dir.yahoo.com/Arts/Humanities/History/By_Time_Period/Ancient_ History/Roman/People/Caesar__Gaius_Julius__100_44_BCE_/ |
5.
Antony and Cleopatra (1974) Click for larger image 161 Minutes |
Not
Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton. It is an ITV television production of Trevor Nunn's stage version performed by London's
Royal Shakespeare Company, which was shown in the United States to great acclaim in 1975. Most
critics agree that
it's the best mass media A and C ever produced. The time
period is from 41 BC through 29 BC, but the action is
much compressed by Shakespeare. http://www.sparknotes.com/shakespeare/antony/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_and_Cleopatra http://www-tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/cleopatra/ |
6.
Augustus (2003) Click for larger image 178 Minutes |
"....equal
parts history lesson and soap opera, and thoroughly engaging at all
levels". Peter
O'toole is Augustus on his death bed and
remembering/retelling his life. The film is
surprisingly accurate, and also, surprisingly, the
multiple flashback (and even flashbacks within flashbacks)
form holds the film together. The only really
jarring note is the gratuitous inclusion of Jesus in the
last words of the film, supposedly spoken by the (ghost
of?) Augustus in what appears to be a parody of his Res
Gestae Divi Augusti (= Deeds of the Divine
Augustus). The movie covers the life of Augustus
from 45 BC until his death in 14 AD. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperium:_Augustus http://www.roman-emperors.org/auggie.htm http://www.virgil.org/augustus/ http://classics.mit.edu/Augustus/deeds.html |
7.
Caligula (1979, reworked several times, ours is essentially
the R rated 1981 version.) Click for larger image 101 Minutes |
This is an
attempt to return to the Gore Vidal Caligula
screenplay. Penthouse Magazine operatives had
inserted almost an hour of gratuitous explicit sex and
gore, which was removed for this "R" rated (cleaned up) version of the
notorious Penthouse production. Caligula was
undoubtedly evil and perhaps insane, but most of what we
"know" about him was written by"historians" in the pay of
his enemies after his
assassination, and most
of that is suspiciously similar to what had been written
about previous tyrants in the ancient world. The
action takes place between 31 AD, when Caligula was
summoned to the Villa of Tiberius in Capri, and Caligula's
death in 41 AD. http://www.roman-emperors.org/gaius.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula_%28film%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula |
8.
Satyricon (1969) Click for larger image 129 Minutes |
Satyricon (Fellini Satyricon) is a 1969 film by Federico Fellini that is loosely based on the Petronius novel Satyricon, a series of bawdy and
satirical episodes written during the reign of the emperor
Nero and set in imperial
Rome. Many literature "experts" call the Petronius
work the world's first novel. The original text
survives only in large fragments, and instead of trying to
connect the fragments which survived, Fellini presented
the material in a series of somewhat disjointed and
dislocated scenes. Petronius, usually identified
with Petronius Arbiter, is thought to have been Nero's
"master of the revels". The date of the "events" in
the Satyricon is unclear, but the work most likely dates
from Nero's reign 54 - 68 AD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satyricon_%28film%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satyricon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petronius http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federico_Fellini |
9.
Gladiator (2000) Click for larger image 155 Minutes |
A fiction
set in the reign of Commodus, the film, nonetheless, is
very good on Roman architecture, costume, life style, and
general ambiance -- good enough for the film to become a
staple of university ancient
history and archeology
courses. The history of Commodus, like that of
Caligula 120 years before him, was written by historians
in the pay of his erstwhile enemies. Commodus was
named Caesar by his
father, Marcus Aurelius, at age 5
in 166 AD and was made co-Augustus , in 178 AD. He
reigned alone from his father's death in 180 AD
until 192 when he was assassinated -- he was not killed in
the arena as shown in the movie. http://www.mmdtkw.org/VCommodus.html http://abacus.bates.edu/~mimber/Rciv/gladiator.htm http://www.vroma.org/~bmcmanus/arena.html http://www.exovedate.com/the_real_gladiator_one.html http://ablemedia.com/ctcweb/consortium/gladiators.html |
10.
Titus (1999) Click for larger image 162 Minutes |
Titus
Andronicus, one of Shakespeare's earliest plays, is
certainly his most violent. It was written, before
Shakespeare found his own more mellow style, for an Elizabethan audience already
inured to violent "revenge plays" modeled after the nine
Senecan tragedies. Our movie is Julie Taymor's
production, in which she fearlessly shows all of
Shakespeare's violence. It is set in the period of
"military anarchy" beginning with Maximus Thrax and ending
with the formation of the Tetrarchy by Diocletian (235 -
285 AD) during the reign of a fictional Emperor
Saturninus. Shakespeare's and Taymor's bloody story
accurately reflects the violence of that time.
Something to consider: Who commits the first violent
act that provokes revenge? Taymor had staged Titus in New
york in 1995 before her Lion King success and returned to
it for her first movie. http://www.geocities.com/hopkinsfanatic/titusnyt.htm http://www.culturekiosque.com/nouveau/cinema/rhevideo2.html http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3768/is_200401/ai_n9394382 http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3768/is_200201/ai_n9057295 http://www-tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/titus/index.html http://www.answers.com/topic/senecan-tragedy |